The reason for this is that consumers will then resort to unregulated means to receive them. This was discussed in Lindorff's reading, using Australia as an example regarding how, although it would theoretically be the best option for abortion to remain illegal in terms of harm minimization, deaths would continue to occur due to illegal abortions. Allowing them to be legal can actually be considered socially responsible as it represents a greater alternative for society, despite what some individuals/groups may believe. Therefore, controversial industries can be truly socially responsible. The discussions I have had regarding what makes a company socially responsible and whether commitment to corporate social responsibility can be considered genuine show that controversial industries can be truly socially responsible, however, there will always be individuals/groups who they may perceive a company's socially responsible actions as a more "sinister" movement with additional
tags