Because retribution justice is as futile as restitution justice. Concerns about the ineffectiveness of traditional criminal justice systems have perpetuated new approaches to criminal justice. Such new approaches to transitional justice or restorative justice such as truth commission, trials, reparation and lustration or control. But the fear of restorative justice and retributive justice bring the topic to light and make clear that each is not such a flawless or direct response to justice for all legitimate victims. From 1945 to 2003 we saw many different types of courts brought together to handle criminal offenders. Therefore, in exploring human interconnectedness, humanity's overreaction to emotions and method of justice will illustrate why restoration justice is as futile as traditional restitution justice. Restorative justice is a theory of justice that is based on reconciliation rather than punishment. The most important principle depends on the idea that a developed society operates with a balance between “respect for human rights and recognition of the responsibility and accountability with which the new democracy wishes to be characterized (Tutu page 54)”. What is necessary for the success of restorative justice when an event occurs that disrupts the balance, it is necessary to establish methods to restore the balance, so that community members, the victim and the offender, can come come to terms with the accident and move on with their lives. One such example is from Desmond Tutu's No Future Without Forgiveness, "the central concern is the healing of violations, the redressing of imbalances, the restoration of broken relationships, the attempt to rehabilitate both the victim and the perpetrator, which should. .. ... half of the document ...... his conduct, thus having a positive impact on the community and Ubuntu. International standards for community-based justice have also been developed, thus leading this transitional justice to have positive and negative impact on the conduct of countries. Restorative and retributive justice is not free from criticism about the lack of bureaucratic and constitutional rights or due process of criminals, questions about the authority to decide the course of a crime. case. Consequently, the concern for the guarantee of protection and the possibility of injustices when civic duties are left to interested parties to govern. The lack of the lawyer's role for defense or public responses is often from the opponent's perspective and not seen as traditional sanctions, makes punishment and reparation very ineffective to face judges.