“Given the serious global dilemmas posed by population growth, why should we consider low fertility rates a problem?” (page 340). I think this question raises a great concern for the human species in general. If the number of people on this earth is decreasing, this is not necessarily a good thing. It is remarkable to remember that population studies were not so widespread before the Second War. People have not been involved regarding population growth. Indeed, their evolving population has been considered a mathematical rather than demographic analysis. After World War II, human ecology became a well-developed discipline introducing important data regarding their change/evolution into post-war populations. Anyone can argue that if the increase existed and continued to increase, then several margins would have affected the population. For example, reasonable populations support a greater number of individuals who can solve, speak, and specify their own concepts. Other people brainstorm to contribute to the advancement of the world in intervals of technology, science and faith. Furthermore, the...