There has been an increase in support for taking strong action against North Korea which has seemed unpredictable in its steps and decisions especially in security terms. It has maintained its position on the nuclear arsenal and other programs associated with it, creating a threat to the security of the entire region and the entire region in general (Kim, 2002 pg.6). It has also refused to engage in any form of negotiation, forcing other nations to abandon further negotiations and are determined to take strong action against it. I strongly disagree with the position of taking strong action against North Korea and withdrawing any further dialogue. North Korea's involvement in the nuclear plan and program will not pose a threat to other international nations. My argument will be based on support for North Korea's nuclear proliferation and how it poses no threat to other nations. These nations who have pushed for forceful actions taken against North Korea and the abandonment of further denials and talks with it have supported the denuclearization of North Korea. It was North Korea's nuclear test on October 9, 2006, actually the first, that triggered the various reactions and actions on the part of the country. international nations. The United States led these nations in an effort to strongly control North Korea's nuclear program. This ordeal also forced them to struggle to find sanctioning solutions suited to their needs. This action by international nations creates space for discussions and various arguments as to why so many nations are seeking the denuclearization program and what their intentions might be, especially when thought of from an economic point of view. Despite North Ko's actions... halfway through the document... it tells what most motivates the nation to proliferate its nuclear arsenal and program. North Korea had ambitions to specialize in nuclear weapons, “to gain de facto recognition as a nuclear-armed nation,” especially in the arms trade foreign exchange market (Yoshihara and James, 2012 pg.215). His motivations are clear. International nations pushing for denuclearization assume that North Korea will use its weapons to control the rest of the world, which is far from North Korea's ambitions for nuclear proliferation. From the above I clearly disagree with the situation of North Korea being seen as a threat to international nations and the entire world due to the proliferation of nuclear weapons. No force action should be taken against it because it is on the right path of proliferation and its motives can be clearly seen.