Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “It may be true that the law it can't make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important. This prevalent quote from Dr. King gives us his feelings and logical reasoning when it comes to lynching. He accepts the idea that he may not be accepted because of the color of his skin, but at least there are now laws in place to discourage others from committing a hate crime. This quote explains why we as humans should be cognitive thinkers, who reason logically, with a legal system in place structured to ensure everyone gets a fair trial by a jury of their peers. Ida B. Wells-Barnett was effective, as evidenced through ethos, pathos, and logos, while also providing concrete evidence to convey her points and support her claims in the article “Lynching and the Excuse for It.” However, the opposite was the case in the article “Ain't I Woman”, by Isabella Baumfree, as she used an emotional approach to convey her argument. In this essay we will compare these two readings paying attention to ethos, pathos and logos to support both authors' arguments. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay First, let's look at these two readings in terms of ethics. Over the course of fifteen years, two thousand people were killed unethically, following lynchings. No convincing evidence was brought at the trial to prove that the alleged individuals were guilty of their crimes. Jane Addams then published her proclamation in support of lynching, assuming that this method of execution without trial might be the only effective way to deal with criminals of this category. It was unquestionably immoral, as civilized citizens we should be proactive in having ethics that govern our society; being able to reason that respect for human life is what separates us from the animal kingdom. Both authors appeal to pathos in their articles. Ida B. Wells-Barnett felt strong in her moral duty to fight against racial discrimination and unscrupulous violence against her own race. She was risking her life by publishing this article, being an African American woman in a time of high racial political tension. Furthermore, Isabella Baumfree used emotional resonance through her writing to influence the reader to support the women's rights movement. The article went on to describe the preferential inequalities of both women and African Americans during this era. Isabella Baumfree has actively participated in the field of women's rights. In a male-dominated society, she wanted everyone to be aware of the inequality between African American women and Americans throughout time. Several claims are made that African Americans and women are inferior to white men. By targeting these men, she tries to convince her audience to support the women's rights movement. In terms of logos, Ida B. Wells-Barnett later demonstrated, by providing public documents as evidence, that many had been lynched on what should have been misdemeanor charges, as we read: “It shows that men, not a few, but hundreds were lynched for minor crimes, while others suffered death for crimes not known to the law, attributing as causes "mistaken identity", "insulting", "bad reputation". ""unpopularity", "breach of contract". ", "enforcement of quarantine", "provision of.