“I don't agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,” a quote that gives many people's perspective on free speech. This quote provides an example of a different view some may have on this topic and provides insight into what the true meaning of free speech is; and because it is a natural right for all of us to have it. The existence of free speech is not such that you can understand what everyone has to say, but it is such that you can understand that everyone has the right simply to say it. Understanding is accepting that what is said makes sense to the speaker and that he or she truly believes what he or she says. Understanding why someone can say what they want is free speech, not whether you agree with what someone says. Along with any other amendment, right or law there will always be some type of violation. Some examples: yelling fire in a crowd around a speech or threatening the life of someone who doesn't agree with your speech. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Free speech is controversial due to the many different approaches. Some different approaches that can transform the view of free speech are: cultural, religious, opinion, race and history. Free speech is an umbrella term that gives us many rights that allow us to say whatever we want, but does not give us the right to abuse those privileges. Freedom of speech allows us to express our opinion however we choose to do so. However, free speech does not allow you to threaten harm to someone, directly or indirectly. Since liberals are the ones who "stifle" diversity on college campuses, they have given a lot to their category. Liberals are believed to be those who influence diversity due to their open-mindedness. Conservatives are believed to be those who hate everything and everyone except themselves. These types of things are said on behalf of both groups, but how can we trust what is said, especially with all the influence social media produces. The community has the right to own their opinions, but they also have the right to share their opinions. The free speech argument, in this case, focuses on free speech on campuses. It is argued that free speech on campus does not meet the requirements of the First Amendment, of course this is through the eyes of students and other locals. Free speech is not a privilege that is taken away when you get out of your car and when you take a job. Fearing losing your job when you express your opinion is not right and that system in itself should be reviewed. Whether you are a teacher or a receptionist at a dental office, in either situation, you still have your natural rights; your right to the truth being self-evident and that all men are created equal. That said, you don't give up your right to free speech when you walk onto a campus. Free speech is very vague in itself and is sometimes misinterpreted. The way they use free speech is also very vague due to the various distributions or deliveries of their “free speech”. Sometimes it is necessary to use offensive language and/or symbolic gestures to get your point across. Every person is unique, which means everyone's idea of ​​free speech changes. There is no “one” side of free speech because some “free speech” is dangerous and can lead to injury, which would be an example of abuse of free speech. The transition between “good” and “bad” free speech is obscured depending on the specific circumstances. An example of “good”.