Topic > A report on the book Killer Angels by Michael Shaara

The author of The Killer Angels is Michael Shaara. Michael Shaara is a famous American author of many different types of fiction books or stories, such as science fiction, sports fiction, and historical fiction. He was born in 1928 in Jersey City, New Jersey. The university he graduated from is Rutgers University in 1951 and during his college days, his only goal is to become a writer. He joins Theta Chi and previously served in the Korean War as a sergeant in the 82nd Airborne Division. Before Michael Shaara began publishing numerous award-winning science fiction stories in the early 1950s, he was an amateur boxer and police officer. He also began writing straight fiction and published more than 70 stories in magazines such as Playboy, Redbook, Cosmopolitan, The Saturday Evening Post and many others. The television dramas use two of her stories to introduce them to the late 1950s. While writing short stories, he teaches literature at Florida State University in Tallahassee. In the early 1960s he began working on his first novel, mainly about the story of a soldier who becomes a boxer after returning home from the Korean War. In 1968, The Broken Place was published by New American Library. He gets very stressed writing books or stories and teaching, so he begins to rely on cigarette smoking and coffee, which causes him to have a heart attack at the young age of 36, but he makes a full recovery. After seven years, The Battle of Gettysburg, The Killer Angels writing is rejected by the first fifteen publishers who see the manuscript. Finally, in 1973, it was purchased by the small independent publisher The David McKay Company. In 1975, the novel The Battle of Gettysburg, The Killer Angels, won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction. Although it won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, not many viewers appreciate the personalized story of our nation's most horrific chapter. Which disappointed him a lot, so his writing veered in different directions. He is always surrounded by the turbulent political climate of Florida State University in the 1960s, so he is writing the novel A Rebel in Autumn, which centers on a violent confrontation between radical students and the "establishment", but never finds a publisher. . He is struggling to maintain the quality of his writing after suffering the effects of a devastating motorcycle accident. He publishes a novel, The Herald in 1981. On May 5, 1988, Michael Shaara dies, but although his novel, The Killer Angels, is not very popular while he is alive, five years later, the film "Gettysburg" was published, which makes The Killer Angels number one on the New York Times bestseller list. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The novel The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara is through the perspective of the main generals of the warring parties to promote the development of the plot, draws a magnificent picture of the group of heroes. The supreme commander of this battle, Robert Lee, is like a person venerated at the altar. He was the president of West Point Military Academy. There are many generals in the North and South who are his students. Not only that, Li is a gentleman who has no bad habits, is humble and courteous, takes care of his subordinates, and never shirks responsibilities. For Southern soldiers, it's almost a fatherly role. When their most beloved General Lee rested, the army of 15,000 automatically passed by his tent, and it was automatically paralyzed, just so as not to wake him. Li was a Southerner, but had served in the Federal Army before the outbreak of the Civil War. When the South preached separation, he opposed it.When the war had just begun, President Lincoln even invited him to become the senior commander of the Army of the North. Li did not want to attack his hometown and resolutely withdrew from the federal army and joined the southern army. As soon as he entered the military camp, he couldn't help himself. At the beginning of the book, Robert Lee led an army of 70,000 men to cross the Potomac River and burned the war in the northern lands, violating his vow never to invade. At the Battle of Gettysburg, Robert E. Lee insisted on using flesh-based tactics to attack the highlands. He has an unshakable responsibility for the loss. However, the war lasted longer than everyone expected. The old man who needs convincing knows that his energy is limited. Even the idea of ​​a battle is excusable. After the end of the war he laid down his weapons and asked his men to do the same. If it were not for his great prestige, the civil war might not have ended so soon. Longstreet is Lee's right-hand man and the most important person in the book, or you can say he is the most tragic person. That winter, his three children died within a week and his wife gave in to grief. The poker player was isolated with laughter. After the death of "StoneWall Jackson", he became the most important lord of Li. For this reason he is often compared to Jackson. Both are excellent generals, Jackson's courage is unmatched, and Longstreet is calmer and more rational. He disagreed with Napoleon's accusation, but his defense tactics were rarely understood or appreciated. Those who are directed often don't know how to change. After the defeat of the war, no one blames General Li (although Lee bears all his responsibilities on his own body), but there are no rumors about it, and it caused public anger. After the war, Longstreet joined the Republican Party in the North, hoping to join with old friends in rebuilding the South. He was considered a changemaker and became the "most hated person among Southerners." The narrative clues in this book are bifurcated and the plot of the story is relatively broken. Like the characters in the novel, we are in the midst of fatal speculation, of uncertain values, of chaos and tension in the target chaos. Many points of view and concepts that seem taken for granted show their embarrassing side. Some issues are almost ambiguous and even “politically incorrect”. The author's brushstroke touches on the legitimacy of the war itself. The author reminds us that the United States has a state after the state, state power does not succumb to sovereignty, there is such a check and balance to have the founding of the United States, and the South has the support of the Supreme Federal Court on the issue of slavery, so this war is not only Even the so-called "liberation of blacks" and "maintaining unity" in the North are constitutional and legal issues on which the South relied (which we call "rebellion"). The 'freedom' of the United States is based on the noble words of the founding of the country, the author's question is more fierce, when the Northern Army ordered to shoot soldiers who refused to fight, the author borrowed Commander Chamberlain's order to ask: 'How can you force a person to fight? For freedom?! Deprivation of liberty for the sake of freedom, what is the difference between the South and slavery for the sake of liberty?', Chamberlain believed that in the face of these soldiers it was simply hypocritical to speak of 'defence of the hometown principle' or to use 'mother' for lyrical.This book is a multi-voiced narrative that goes hand in hand, not only means that the monopoly of a single ideology is broken, but also the description of people on a richer level. The generals in the book,.