The Boy in the Striped Pajamas continues the literary tradition of the evil of the Holocaust through the eyes of a child. This book contrasts the difference between man's inhumanity towards man and man's ability to care and love. The main theme, however, is the portrayal of children's innocence. It shows that no matter the circumstance, a child will always see another child as the same. They don't see race, color, or any other prejudices that adults tend to have. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Author John Boyne said he believed the only way he could write respectfully about the Holocaust was through the eyes of a child. Demonstrating how Bruno and Shmuel maintain the innocence of their childhood despite what happens around them. Boyne recognizes that the only people who can truly understand the horrors of the Holocaust are those who lived through it. It gives a voice to the victims, especially the millions of innocent children who died at the hands of the Nazis. What makes "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas" so effective is that instead of examining the big picture of the Holocaust and its cruelty, it instead focuses on individual relationships and gives viewers the perspective of two innocent boys trying the same ideal friendship. On the one hand there is Bruno's misunderstanding of why people in striped pajamas are considered “non-human” and how they differ from others. On the other hand, there is the awareness of reality and the unnatural acceptance of the world as it is. However, Boyne classifies 'The Boy in the Striped Pajamas' as a fable, a story that carries with it a moral lesson. This film falls into the category as it teaches many lessons. Among these valuable lessons, perhaps the most significant is the final sentence which suggests that "Nothing like this could ever happen again, not in this day and age." It forces observers to confront the sad reality that hatred, discrimination and intolerance remain powerful forces in the world. Viewers consider their own prejudices and actions, perhaps wondering if they are guilty of mistreating others. Furthermore, some might also consider what their role in the Holocaust might have been, whether bystander, perpetrator, or victim. For such a young boy, Bruno has a remarkably strong sense of morality and ethics in "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas." I don't think it comes from his father, who is a Nazi, although we can only assume he got it from the female figures in his life, namely his mother and grandmother. Bruno, unlike many Nazis, does not see anyone else in his life as inferior or subhuman. Bruno is more interested in bonds than differences and seeks loyalty, trust and kindness in people, qualities found in every good human being, regardless of race or class. When Bruno is forced to leave Berlin, one of his main complaints is that he also has to leave his three best friends. To make matters worse, when he arrives at his new home in Auschwitz, there are no other families or children around. Despite their many differences, these two form a bond that transcends race and even barriers, so much so that when asked if he still wants to return to Berlin, Bruno confidently says no. In a world ruled by hate, Bruno and Shmuel prove that friendship can thrive even in the darkness. Bruno and Shmuel didn't have this hatred. They were just two kids who didn't even have the faintest idea of ​​what was happening around them and how.