Topic > A question of spending money in the lyrics "Stuff is Not Salvation" and "On Dumpster Driving"

In the lyrics "Stuff is Not Salvation" by Anna Quindlen, she talks about how people in America get carried away and spend money their money on ridiculous things. They need to realize how they spend their money and what impacts occur because of their decisions. Anna Quindlen is absolutely against people wasting their money. It goes to further explain the difference between what you actually need and what you don't need at all. He also explains that you don't really need to buy expensive items to impress other people. In the text “On Dumpster Driving” by Lars Eighner he talks about how people spend their money just to be wasteful. Both authors are right. Why spend money on ridiculous things you don't even need. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay People think that the things they buy will change their lives, but they don't realize that they are puzzled because why spend money on something that someone else can actually use because all you will do is throw it away. Just because the ads make it seem interleaved and irresistible, doesn't mean you have to buy it! When people waste money on useless things, it shows that it is easy to sell anything. There are much more important things to buy, for example school, food, housing, etc. It's okay to buy nice things and take care of yourself, but people shouldn't go overboard and buy expensive items that you don't need or can get. cheaper. People should prioritize their decisions because they are wasting money that can be invested in something smart or safer. So basically I spend money to waste my stuff and I still won't be happy. If people thought more about their decisions and realized what can happen when they spend their money. In the text "On Dumpster Driving" by Lars Eighner, Eighner talks about how people throw away valuable things after spending their money on them. “Things are not salvation” (Quindlen) says “does anyone really need a flat screen, or a designer bag”? In other words, he is saying that that flat screen is worth buying, that the bills have been paid, the food on the table, etc. When they buy all that stuff, they won't be happy anyway their money for things they don't need and once they get tired of it, they find it in the dumpster. If it ends up in the dumpster and it's not food you brought, they wasted their money because they didn't need it, and you did. Keep in mind: This is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay Both authors show that people waste their money on useless items, Anna Quindlen shows how people think of needing something when it's not important, so all they want to do is spend their money on things and throw it away when they get tired of it. The way it relates to Lars Eighter is that he was a dumpster diver and would find, as he put it, "perfectly new" things that people just waste. It explains how selfish people are when they simply waste things that other people in the world can't even have because they don't have the money to afford them. I completely agree with both authors of each text because I know there is a difference between wanting something and needing it. The Americans.