Usually, undercover work has been used in a targeted trial as part of a criminal investigation after a crime has occurred, where there is a suspect and the His hesitation led to one being targeted by federal agents. However, in today's generation undercover work has become part of efforts to predict crimes that have not yet been committed, where there is no suspect, and where deterrence is an important goal. In other words, the purpose of undercover work is to prevent crimes that are anticipated and intended to be committed in the future. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In the field of covert practices, three types of agent behavior are of specific interest: the practice of excessive deception, the use of coercion, and the offering of seductive temptations. These types of behaviors must be used within reasonable limits, because if they are abused you enter the line of entrapment. Therefore, the undercover officer's actions depicting any of these characteristics could lead to a debate as to whether the suspect acted upon a criminal act with independence and full knowledge of the prohibited nature of his behavior or not. The circumstances are ethically different when you are led into illegal activities by a government agent who claims that no misconduct is occurring. This is where the officer creates a hoax to make the suspect believe that nothing illegal is happening. In several ABSCAM cases, defendants were led to believe they could generate money to the exclusion of having to keep any promises. The problem is that they are led to believe something that is not true and instead take part in certain acts because of this incentive, so dishonesty is used to trick someone into carrying out criminal activities and is considered a morally wrong strategy. Another problematic situation includes the use of deception against people with moderate skills, such as mentally limited or ill people, minors, and people under extreme pressure or in a state of destitution. Such individuals are more likely to be susceptible to persuasion and less capable than most citizens of distinguishing right from wrong. As part of the investigation, the undercover officer may aim to create or exacerbate such conditions in the victim. Not only is this morally wrong because of deception, but it can be a selfish way to achieve a goal by playing into the mental state of someone who is already unstable and weak. This target group of mentally ill, drug addicts or young people are all individuals who are inclined to fall into whatever seems beneficial to them and requires less thought. Playing with someone with a weaker mindset and unstable mentally, physically and emotionally is unethical as the impact of deception could have a greater impact on the recovery of one's mental health and well-being. Forced participation arises from the concern of failure to alternatively mediate an individual's full intent or purpose. One component of this seems naturally intuitive in specific deceptive criminal conditions; or in hiring as informants people accustomed to exhausting threats of violence to dictate their actions. There are several issues that temptation prompts more than coercion or deception. Therefore, regardless of whether or not it is a reaction to a very tempting incentive, an act committed is still seen as no less criminal with or without the appearance of temptation. The topics introduced replace the notions on which the approach is based,.