In this essay I will discuss a major change introduced by the Care Act 2014, which was the way in which adults were safeguarded. The term 'safeguarding' is used to describe a wide range of duties, measures and powers covering the criminal justice, health, housing and social care sectors. Research states that safeguarding means protecting an adult's right to live in a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect. This involves professionals and other individuals working together to prevent and stop both the risks and the experience of abuse or neglect. Also to ensure that adult welfare is promoted and to consider the opinions, wishes and feelings of service users when deciding on any action. Since the Care Act 2014 came into force there have been many changes which have impacted on safeguarding practices, which are guidelines on how to make safeguarding personal. This allows operators to have a positive approach towards service users, involving them in their safeguarding situation. Another change affecting protection under the Care Act 2014 is the force-based perspective used to protect the individual from harm. It focuses on the service user's situation, vulnerabilities, strengths and qualities of the client. This essay will also include the implications of this during practice. Before the Care Act 2014 there was no established way for local authorities to assess safeguarding, now there is. This will also be included, as well as how users of the service can manage risk. In this essay I will discuss a case study showing how social workers' errors in social work affected the safety and risk of two service users. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Prior to the Care Act 2014, safeguarding practice had used personalization as a focus of practice for over a decade. Personalization is a social care approach that states that each person receiving support, whether provided by the statutory service or self-funded, will have choice and control over how this is shaped around the support in care settings. Personalization is about the dignity and well-being of the individual. The Care Act 2014 came into force in April 2015 and replaced previous laws relating to carers and carers. This law outlines how local authorities should carry out carer assessments and needs assessments. It also looks at how local authorities should determine who is entitled to support and what the costs for residential and community care should be. This act is primarily for adults in need of care and support. However, there are provisions for the transition of children in need of care and support and young people in foster care. But the Children and Families Act 2014 contains guidance on this. Before the Care Act statutory services were responsible for safeguarding for many years, but there were no clear laws behind this. It is therefore unclear who is responsible for what in practice. One of the guidelines in the Care Act 2014 for safeguarding is to 'Make Safeguarding Personal (MSP)'. This means that advocacy should be person-led and outcome-focused. In this conversation, guidance will be provided on how to best respond to protection that develops involvement, choice and control. As well as improving the quality of life, wellbeing and safety of service users. Yes it isThere was a recent case where it emerged that a social worker failed to safeguard his client by not attending hospital discharge meetings and by failing to put together a care plan that suited the client. Research shows that the professional had admitted he was not competent for the role and had let the client down. This case study shows that this is one of the many social work professionals who felt they were under pressure at work. But despite this he did not seek help and support, which led to him failing in his role and this also posed significant risk to the service user (Haynes 2018). This shows that the social worker failed to comply with safeguarding policies such as 'Making guardianship personal' and did not follow the Care Act 2014. The reason for this is because when he had a meeting with the service user, the service user did not open the door for him. But the professional did not contact the client or try other ways to contact the service user. For example by letter, SMS or through a third party, such as a family member. Following the MSP guidelines states that the professional should promote choice, control and involvement in their own case. But based on this case study this has not been achieved, among other things such as ensuring the service user is safe when discharged from hospital. According to the case study it is stated that the professional was assigned another case discussed in this article. He was assigned an investigation to look into as the service user was at risk as the client had autism and emotionally unstable personality disorder. This referral has been made so that the appropriate care plan and support can be put in place to assist the service user. However, the practitioner had not looked into this and had not conducted the investigation. When questioned about it he did not explain why he did so. The research states that MSP cannot be used by local authorities but is for everyone. This includes all those involved in healthcare provision and support in relation to safeguarding. MSP focuses on the person and not the process. In this case the practitioner did not pursue the matter further in order to use the MSP's guidance to assist them in practice and provide the best possible outcome for the service user. The policies supported by the MSP help those who work with adults on how to develop rapid and personalized safeguarding responses and also include how to involve the client in the decision-making process. MSP is great to use and has many benefits for the client and the professional, the reason is that, as mentioned above, it is person-driven and results-focused, which empowers people and gives hope to a client when they are working through their care plans with the appropriate support around them. It also takes into account the customer's wishes. But customer safety must also be considered, as customers cannot have anything that puts them in danger. For example, in the case study the client suffered from autism and unbalanced personality disorder. He may ask to socialize and go to the local pub alone on a weekly basis. However, due to his condition, he may not be able to recognize social cues, such as being able to recognize who is safe to talk to and who is not. They could be easily manipulated into drinking excessively or they could be lured by other individuals. That's why requests can be taken into consideration, but whether or not they will be fulfilled by healthcare workers depends on how much it isSafe. Safeguarding must be considered in all cases and referrals to protect the client from harm or risk. Research suggests when acting in someone's best interests not to make assumptions about an individual's mental capacity based on age, appearance, or mental condition. Also consider the individual's past, present beliefs, values, desires and feelings. The next point to discuss is the strength-based approach in relation to safeguarding an individual under the Care Act 2014. The Care Act requires local authorities to adopt a strength-based approach throughout the service user journey and this must be implemented in all interventions and interactions with the service user. The strength-based approach is a process between a service user, different services and the health workers who are supporting them. This approach allows them to work collaboratively to decide on an outcome that focuses on the service user's strengths and assets. The terms strengths and assets refer to the different skills and qualities that help the service user to manage things in everyday life and which would consequently help them to meet their needs and achieve their goals. For example, they could be the individual's skills, competences and knowledge. Also the social aspect of the individual such as the resources he has around him such as community centers, universities, social programs. This also links to the community resources available to the individual. Referring to the case study it is stated that the professional failed to assess the service user, prepare care plans and review the risks involved. However, based on strengths-based practice, social work practitioners are expected to conduct care plans and risk assessments to enable them to identify the individual's strengths and areas of development. Yet in this case this was not followed, this is not to say that strength-based practice is not effective, rather that the practitioner was not competent enough to carry out his role. Social workers have many responsibilities and commitments to service users, but the case article stated that the department she worked with was poorly organised. This results in the failure of the team as a whole, not just the professional. According to research, when implementing the strength-based approach within social work, professionals need to spend time researching and familiarizing themselves with community resources. The person held responsible would be the professional and adequate time needs to be allocated for the assessment so that nothing is missed. The social worker did not assess the client who had been discharged from the hospital, or the other client to whom she had been assigned, to investigate her risks. Nor did he prepare the care plan he was supposed to do. Therefore he let himself down as a professional, his vulnerable and at-risk clients, he also let down the team he worked with. The professional did not dedicate time to his duties towards service users, therefore was not successful in his role. Regardless of whether the strength-based approach is effective in practice with clients and professionals, there are many practice implications that social workers must address. Senior and middle managers, as well as professionals, may be affected as they will have to make adjustments and allowances to accommodate the strength-based approach (SCIE). Referring to the case study, it was stated that the professional was working under pressure and was struggling to copecases. However, he did not ask for help or raise the issue with senior professionals. If he had talked to someone he would have gotten some sort of support that would have helped him in practice. The professional has let himself down in this area, as professionals are aware before their qualification that this is a role that comes with a lot of pressure and responsibility. As an individual you need to be able to ask for help when required, this also impacts the competence of your role. Since appraisals may take longer than usual, this also includes appraisal preparation and closing as each case is different and unique in its own way. Also because professionals need to have greater knowledge and awareness of community resources, particularly as part of their work. Research suggests that the person who raises a safeguarding concern within their agency should follow established policies and procedures. This concern is usually the result of something the professional saw, was told or heard. Social workers will carry out an assessment to clarify safeguarding concerns. If there are safeguarding concerns such as being due to financial, emotional, physical abuse or other factors, appropriate measures will be taken to protect the adult from harm and provide them with a safe environment to live in. They may receive an emergency referral to supported accommodation if the abuse is taking place at home and can raise the matter with the police and other professional agencies where relevant. It should be clarified in the initial contact whether adult safeguarding concerns fall within the adult safeguarding duties set out in the Care Act 2014. According to the research, local authorities have new safeguarding duties; must have a local multi-agency adult safeguarding system. The purpose of this system would be to prevent abuse and neglect and stop it quickly when it occurs. They should investigate the risk of abuse and neglect and find out what actions they will need to take. The local authority should also set up safeguarding committees, which means involving the NHS and police where appropriate to share and implement a strategy. If the service user dies as a result of neglect or abuse, inquiries will be made to the local authority. or his partners to find out what they could have done to protect the individual. The article in the case stated that the management team had been alerted to the professional when a client died two months after being referred to the local authority. Furthermore there were two other cases discussed in this essay which led to the formation of a tribunal and the suspension of the professional from his role. When making a safeguarding request or review, the service user may need an advocate to represent and support the individual. The practitioner will also look into this. Before the Care Act 2014 there were no fixed assessments that local authorities had to follow for safeguarding. But since the Care Act 2014 came into force, it provides them with a strategic plan to assess concerns about safeguarding individuals. Appropriate training is also provided to help them put this into practice. However in this case, even though the Care Act 2014 was put in place, they did not follow the protocol. But this is not a flaw in the Care Act 2014 because the changes were made so that professionals can safeguard them properly and have a greater impact on service users. If professionals do not follow these instructions, it may be due to their skills and abilities..