Topic > The Paris Peace Accords: Compromises to End the Vietnam War Harini Venkata Chalapathi

THE PARIS PEACE AGREEMENTS: Compromises to End the Vietnam War Harini Venkatachalapathi Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayWorld History Honors Period 2 Mr.Coburn 11/18/18 "Were it bad decisions made by civilian leaders, hostile media, and the antiwar movement, or was it doomed to fail from the start?" (The Wrong War) The Paris Peace Accords were signed on January 27, 1973 to end the Vietnam War. This led to the establishment of a ceasefire that took effect on January 28, but the war continued even after the ceasefire as South Vietnamese troops continued to receive aid from the United States even as U.S. ground troops walked away they were gone. It began as an agreement between the governments of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, the Republic of Vietnam and the United States, but now the Paris Peace Accords have gone down in history as a deliberate fraud in every sense.Thesis: from moment of the ceasefire they left and American ground troops left South Vietnam, it could be said that the Paris Peace Accords were a fraud and were not taken seriously and the war continued; the Paris Peace Accords were considered a joke from the beginning and the result was to take this full-scale war to a whole new level. What happened during the peace conferences no one knows except those who attended the conference and those who saw hundreds of hours of tape-recorded Allied war advice. The expected results of the peace talks were simple: a ceasefire is triggered, all US ground troops leave the lands of Vietnam, a compromise is reached between North and South Vietnam, all troops stop fighting and therefore the war ends. Nothing happens that was expected, but perhaps the first things did happen: the ceasefire goes off and the American ground troops leave, but then North and South Vietnam totally ignore the ceasefire and bring the war in a completely new phase. "In June it was known that Abrams, appointed as the next Army Chief of Staff, would soon leave Vietnam. The troops he commanded were down to just 69,000, and the demand was that they be reduced by another 20,000 by July 1 " (343, Sorley). American troops were already leaving Vietnam and the peace talks gave them the right opportunity to completely get out of the situation they were in and, while this is true, it is not the only consequence of the peace talks. For those involved in the peace talks, the whole thing was basically a joke, everyone was trying to see how they could benefit from it and most likely forgot or didn't care about the main reason why the peace talks were taking place. first. North Vietnam's main plan was to surround Saigon, and they knew that if they did just that, defeating South Vietnam would be easier than before. "The fall of Saigon in late April 1945 surprised no one. The fall of South Vietnam so quickly, with almost no resistance, shocked North Vietnam's aggressive army and the world." (286, Steinmann). No one expected South Vietnam to give up fighting once the capital was surrounded, however, "South Vietnamese leadership, even in the best of times, has never been good" (286, Steinman) along with the evacuation of American troops they caused S. Vietnam surrendered almost immediately when they knew it was the end for them.