Therefore someone who has specific knowledge or experience should be allowed to testify. This is foundational jurisprudence for forensic scientists, as it is the case that introduced expert testimony (Imwinkelried, 1998). Furthermore, this case also involved the admissibility of scientific evidence known as general acceptance criteria (Imwinkelried, 1998). This ruling stated that evidence must be generally accepted in the particular scientific field of study before it can be presented and accepted as testimony (Imwinkelried, 1998). Frye was specifically referring to the validity of the polygraph test, but it is still applicable today as forensics is always on the cutting edge of technology (Netzel, Keily & Bell, 2014). Therefore, if the scientist's specific jurisdiction still uses the Frye standard, that technology should be generally accepted in a significant portion of that scientific field.