In my opinion, being forced to join a specific group, such as religion or politics, is harmful to society, even if this organization is more directed at places such as prisons and psychiatric institutions (Monnier, 2011). When people are forced to change ideals and goals for a specific group, this forces the goals to change based on that group's needs and desires. It is no longer the individual who decides what the objective is, it is the group. It may be beneficial, such as for those in prisons and mental institutions, but when you look at how this specific organization is structured, the change in goals may not be completely beneficial due to the individual. Some people who are forced into this organization are there for things that are illicit compared to the social norms dictated by those in charge of the organization. If someone goes to prison for downloading files that they are not authorized to, it only goes against the laws dictated and formed by social norms. Many of them have made illegal movie screenings their goal, but being forced to join this organization won't make their goals anything more impressive than to no longer download movies illegally. This organization is more biased in my opinion and is based on group goals that they make others follow when they go against the specific goals. This would be the least efficient
tags