“The true proof of the greatness of a work of art is its ability to be understood by the masses." The statement “The true test of the greatness of a work of art lies in its ability to be understood by the masses;” is highly problematic. Art itself has an ambiguous definition that combines concepts of aesthetics and personal emotion art, it becomes clear that the definition of art is too abstract citation clearly requires a restrictive interpretation of the work of art which makes the current situation questionable. First, what constitutes a work of art and which medium should be accepted as the norm. art, it is essential to understand the different forms in which art manifests itself. There are materials such as clay, wood, canvas, marble, etc. If someone creates an abstract painting on canvas and another artist creates the same piece, but three-dimensionally, does the essence of the artwork change or not? If so, does this change take away from the greatness of the piece? Da Vinci's drawing of the Many-Armed Man is an impressive work of art that many would call great. This label of greatness does not come from the fact that, when examined, it is obviously the drawing of a man. Instead, the sketch offers an intriguing geometric perspective of the man that captures the viewer's attention. Now, if that same work of art became a marble sculpture, would its level of greatness worsen because it might be seen as a perversion of the male figure? Hopefully, by transferring this work of art from one medium to another, its ability to be understood does not weaken it... middle of paper... it's time to find pieces that they find great and that influence them in the way where art should do so. Upon further inspection of the old adage, “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder?” we must evaluate whether beauty constitutes a great work of art. If so, who determines what is beautiful? Art doesn't always have to be about aesthetic beauty, it can be about something more: a message that finds itself reverberating in the viewer's mind. What may constitute a great work of art, some may see as nothing more than glorified scribbles. In conclusion, I must reiterate that the idea that the greatness of art depends on its ability to be understood by the masses is a complete fallacy. . By using and adhering to such a rigorous interpretation of “great art,” society would lose masterpieces that question the breadth of cultural ideals of beauty and art..