Felce (2005) a quality of life defined as a highly subjective measure of happiness that is an important factor in many financial decisions. Factors that play a role in quality of life differ depending on personal preferences, but often include financial security, job satisfaction, family life, health and safety. A quality of life model is proposed that integrates objective and subjective indicators, a wide range of life domains and individual values. It takes into account concerns that externally derived norms should not be applied without reference to individual differences. According to Felce (2005) financial decisions usually involve a trade-off in which the quality of life is decreased to save money or, conversely, the quality of life increases by spending more money. Rosenbaum (2011) stated that quality of life can also be defined in terms of the hierarchical level of satisfaction of the needs of the majority of members of a given society. The greater the satisfaction of the needs of the majority in a given society, the greater the quality of life of that society. Institutions are designed to satisfy human needs in a society, and therefore also the quality of life of a society. Quality of life has an important element and that is the ability to obtain quality healthcare, access to effective education, and adequate waste removal and care according to Rosenbaum (2011). A quality of life model is envisaged that integrates objective and subjective indicators, a wide range of life domains and individual values. The explanation concerns the fact that externally derived norms should not be applied without reference to individual differences. It also allows you to make objective comparisons between the situations of particular groups and what it means...... middle of paper......quality of life. The idea of ​​taking a survey repeatedly over a long period of time, with thousands of other people, to figure out whether you're living a quality life doesn't even fall into the wrong category. This mental model is suitable for tracking your weight or height. Not for quality of life. A variety of quality of life measures can be used for research purposes, Jacob (2009) said, such as economic decision making and for decision making in clinical practice, but must be adapted to these goals. In clinical practice, quality of life measures are currently used for needs assessment and monitoring purposes. Chronic disease management systems, aiming to provide systematic multidisciplinary care that also targets individual needs, often incorporate disease-specific tools to assess needs and monitor changes in the perceived consequences of the disease..