Topic > Functionalism Theory vs. Weberianism on Health - 1365

As Germov, (2014) describes that our society functions perfectly due to interrelated social structures. Each part of society has a purpose, a social obligation and a responsibility to continue the function and keep it stable. The sick member of society will be considered sick, sociologist Talcott Parsons recognized as a social element or dysfunctional condition for the sick person (Germov, 2014). Functionalism describes the role of the sick person to influence social structure and function, so if someone becomes sick, they will no longer be able to perform or carry out the social function and will not be able to continue social responsibility (Jones & Creedy, 2008 ). Sick people need to receive adequate care, recover from the illness and return to normal function in society. According to Sheaff (2005), this approach is concerned with public health and well-being to maintain sociological functions. In contrast to functionalism, bureaucracies in Weberianism have proven to be a very effective tool for eradicating fraud, mismanagement and inefficiency (Germov, 2014). McFalls, (2007) suggests that the bureaucratic approach of Weberianism established levels of management, from the top level managerial role to the supervisor, healthcare professional and junior level staff. The chain of command is responsible for the effective and consistent delivery of health services.